Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Calvin Eugene MURPHY, Walter Edward Handsaker and Owen Morris Jensen, Defendants and Appellants.
PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Raymond Louis BRADBURN, Defendant and Appellant.
These are appeals from judgments and from orders denying motions for new trials after jury verdicts had found the appellants guilty of burglary in the first degree.
Upon appellants' requests for counsel this court appointed Alfred B. McKenzie, Esq., to represent them on appeal. Mr. McKenzie has advised that he finds no merit in the appeals. Each appellant was notified that he could file briefs in propria persona if he so desired. This they have not done. Nevertheless, we have made an independent review of the voluminous record and have concluded there is no ground for reversal.
Guns stolen from the burglarized establishment were found in the trunk of appellant Handsaker's automobile. An eyewitness of the burglary identified appellants Bradburn, Jensen and Murphy as three of the four men he observed committing the crime. Appellants Murphy, Handsaker and Jensen fled from the Handsaker residence when the officers arrived there. Confessions of Jensen and Murphy were introduced into evidence, but the court carefully instructed the jury that the confessions were not to be considered as evidence against the other defendants.
We need not further detail the evidence which was sufficient to support the verdicts. The record reveals no errors of law.
The judgments and the orders are affirmed.
VAN DYKE, Presiding Justice.
SCHOTTKY and PEEK, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 3118.
Decided: March 30, 1961
Court: District Court of Appeal, Third District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)