VERDIER v. VERDIER (1953)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

VERDIER v. VERDIER et al.

Civ. 15713.

Decided: August 17, 1953

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, F. Whitney Tenney, San Francisco, John D. Martin, Oakland, for appellant. Morgan J. Doyle and Paul C. Dana, San Francisco, for respondent.

On this motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was filed one day too late, we heretofore directed the superior court to determine the true date of entry of the judgment appealed from. See Verdier v. Verdier, 118 Cal.App.2d 279, 257 P.2d 723. Pursuant to such direction Hon. Herbert C. Kaufman, Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court, from and after a hearing held on July 22, 1953, found and determined that the true date of entry of judgment was October 17, 1952, instead of October 16th as theretofore certified, and made and filed an ‘Order Correcting Record of Entry of Judgment’ showing October 17th as the true date. A certified copy of said order, together with a certificate of the clerk of said superior court certifying October 17th as the true date of entry, has been filed in this court. It appears therefrom that the notice of appeal was timely filed. Also a consent to the denial of respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed herein by respondent.

Respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal is hereby denied.

BRAY, Justice.

PETERS, P. J., and FRED B. WOOD, J., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network