Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE v. WEXNER.
Defendant was convicted of grand theft. He admitted two prior felony convictions, for which he was imprisoned in other states.
The public defender represented defendant on his trial by the judge of the superior court. On his appeal, defendant has prepared his own briefs. He contends that the amended information does not state a criminal offense, and that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction.
This court has carefully gone over the record. There is no merit in either contention.
The judgment is affirmed.
DRAPEAU, Justice.
WHITE, P. J., and DORAN, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 5096.
Decided: March 01, 1954
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)