Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ex parte EMBRY.
This petitioner was convicted of a felony and has suffered a prior conviction for which he served time. The Adult Authority, pursuant to its rule, has refused to grant him a hearing in order to fix his sentence or to consider his application for a parole, until eighteen months after his commitment. After six months of his term had expired he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court to compel the Authority to grant him a hearing. That court issued the writ with an order substantially similar to that discussed in Ex parte Maro, Cal.App., 141 P.2d 135. The state appeals.
For the reasons set forth in and upon the authority of In re Louis Maro, the order appealed from is nonappealable, and the appeal must be and is dismissed.
PETERS, Presiding Judge.
BRAY and FRED B. WOOD, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 2836.
Decided: September 30, 1952
Court: District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)