TILDEN CO v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (1952)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

G. L. TILDEN & CO., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
WALKUP DRAYAGE & WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
MERCHANTS EXPRESS CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
HAGSTROM'S FOOD STORES, Inc., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
HASLETT WAREHOUSE CO., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
MANNINGS, Inc., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
J. A. CLARK DRAYING COMPANY, Limited, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
HIGHWAY TRANSPORT Incorporated, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
ROBERTSON DRAYAGE COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
FOSTERS LUNCH SYSTEM, Limited, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
UNION ICE & STORAGE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
UNION ICE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
PENINSULA ICE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.

Civ. 15288–15300.

Decided: September 18, 1952

Fabian D. Brown, San Francisco, for petitioners. Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen. of California, Irving H. Perluss, Deputy Atty. Gen., William L. Shaw, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, for respondent.

The facts and issues in these proceedings are similar to those involved in John Breuner Co. v. Superior Court, Cal.App., 246 P.2d 694, this day decided. For the reasons therein stated the orders are affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Hearing denied; SCHAUER, J., dissenting.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network