ESQUIVEL v. RANEY (1951)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California.

ESQUIVEL et al. v. RANEY.

Civ. 18200.

Decided: August 17, 1951

Orloff & Pollack and Ruthe Jacobson, Los Angeles, for appellants. Ralph N. Highsmith, Henry E. Kappler, Los Angeles, for respondent.

Plaintiffs appealed from an order setting aside the entry of the default of defendant Rupert B. Raney. No judgment has been entered in the action.

Section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure enumerates the various orders from which appeals may be taken. An order setting aside a default before judgment is entered is not one of the orders enumerated. It is therefore not appealable. See cases cited in 5 West's Cal.Dig. (1951), Appeal and Error, k113(3), page 152.

Appeal dismissed.

VALĹVALLEE, Justice.

SHINN, P. J., and WOOD, J., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network