Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
George A. BERTRAM, plaintiff and respondent, v. Saverio ORLANDO and Enis Orlando, defendants and appellants.
The submission of the above entitled cause is hereby set aside and the parties are requested to brief the following question:
Can a landowner acquire an easement by prescription to have his buildings encroach upon the surface of the adjoining land?
See on the one hand: Jones on Easements, sec. 161, p. 139; Thompson on Real Property, sec. 417, pp. 682–683; Washburn, Easements and Servitudes, 4th Ed., ch. 1, sec. 4, p. 147 and cases cited; and on the other: Tiffany on Real Property, 3d Ed., sec. 775, p. 238 and cases cited; John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Patterson, 103 Ind. 582, 2 N.E. 188, 53 Am.Rep. 550; Krueger v. Beecham, 116 Ind.App. 89, 61 N.E.2d 65, 70; Sprenzel v. Windmueller, 286 Ill. 411, 121 N.E., 805; Slachter v. Olderman, 116 Conn. 156, 164 A. 202; Carrigg v. Mechanics' Savings Bank, 136 Iowa 261, 111 N.W. 329. Cf. the following California cases: Chapman v. Sky L'Onda, etc., Water Co., 69 Cal.App.2d 667, 159 P.2d 988; Knight v. Cohen, 7 Cal.App. 43, 93 P. 396; Collins v. Gray, 3 Cal.App. 723, 86 P. 983; Emerson v. Bergin, 76 Cal. 197, 18 P. 264; Bernstein v. Dodik, 129 Cal.App. 454, 18 P.2d 983; Belestra v. Button, 54 Cal.App.2d 192, 128 P.2d 816; Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett L. & C. Co., 70 Cal.App. 283, 233 P. 370; Ward v. City of Monrovia, 16 Cal.2d 815, 108 P.2d 425; Hannah v. Pogue, 23 Cal.2d 849, 147 P.2d 572; Shonafelt v. Busath, 66 Cal.App.2d 5, 151 P.2d 873.
The parties to file typewritten briefs. Appellants allowed 20 days; respondent 20 days to reply; and appellants 10 days to file closing brief.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 14341.
Decided: July 25, 1950
Court: District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)