VALLINDRAS v. << (1950)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

Ex parte VALLINDRAS.

Cr. 2675.

Decided: April 20, 1950

Gus C. Ringole, San Francisco, for petitioner.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus does not allege that there was no conflict in the evidence of petitioner's ability to pay under the order nor that there was no evidence supporting the finding. Such was the case found in Re Johnson, 92 Cal.App.2d 467, 207 P.2d 123.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

NOURSE, Presiding Justice.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network