Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Wilton R. MORRISON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. George STYLIANO and Genell Styliano, Defendants and Appellants.
For the reasons given in Heatly v. Heatly, Cal.App., 189 P.2d 748, and for the further reason that appearance or showing in opposition to the motion to dismiss was not made as required by Rule 41 of the Rules on Appeal, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 3923.
Decided: May 12, 1948
Court: District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)