PEOPLE v. ARESEN (1949)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

PEOPLE v. ARESEN.

Cr. 2564.

Decided: April 15, 1949

Nils Aresen, in pro per., and W. O. Weissich, of San Francisco, for appellant. Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen., and David K. Lener, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.

The contention in the petition for rehearing (not heretofore made) that the court erroneously failed to instruct the jury under section 18 of the Corporate Securities Act, Gen.Laws, Act 3814, is well answered by the fact that the court in its original instructions and in the additional instructions requested by the jury, although not mentioning section 18, fully instructed on all the elements of the crime defined by that section and charged in the charging portion of count I of the information. The other contention made by petitioner is covered in our opinion.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network