ROCHE v. McCOLGAN (1947)

District Court of Appeal, Third District, California.

Theo. J. ROCHE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles J. McCOLGAN, Franchise Tax Commissioner of the State of California, Defendant and Respondent.

Civ. 7342; Sac. 5813.

Decided: July 25, 1947

Sullivan, Roche, Johnson & Farraher and Eustice Cullinan, all of San Francisco, for appellant. Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen., and James E. Sabine, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.

It appears from the stipulation of the parties that the same legal questions are presented in this proceeding as those in Cullinan v. McColgan, Cal.App., 183 P.2d 115.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case the judgment herein is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Hearing denied; SHENK and TRAYNOR, JJ., dissenting.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network