Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

LACY v. << (1947)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

Ex parte LACY.

Cr. 2510.

Decided: December 11, 1947

Lucille F. Athearn, of San Francisco, for petitioner.

Petitioner seeks to determine, through habeas corpus proceeding, the property rights of Rosa Lacy growing out of a marriage agreement and subsequent divorce in which the Superior Court determined such property rights. It appears, from the petition, that the Superior Court had jurisdiction over the person and the subject matter. Under such circumstances petitioner's remedy is not by habeas corpus.

The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

FindLaw Marketing Authority Suite

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network

LACY v. << (1947)

Docket No: Cr. 2510.

Decided: December 11, 1947

Court: District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign Up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About The Law

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard