Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WHITAKER v. HAITIAN COFFEE CO. et al.
This case is a companion to that of Hicks v. Haitian Coffee Co. et al., Cal.App., 161 P.2d 564. The averments in the affidavits filed on behalf of the respective parties are practically identical with those contained in the affidavits filed in the Hicks case. The order entered is the same. For the reason stated and upon the authorities therein cited the order herein is affirmed.
MOORE, Presiding Justice.
McCOMB, J., concurs.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 14927.
Decided: September 13, 1945
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)