McINTOSH v. McINTOSH (1945)

District Court of Appeal, Third District, California.

McINTOSH v. McINTOSH et al.
KELL et al. v. McINTOSH.

Civ. 7140; Sac. 5696.

Decided: August 25, 1945

Smallpage & Macomber, of Stockton, for plaintiffs in intervention, appellants. Jones & Quinn, of Stockton, for defendant in intervention, respondent.

This is an appeal by the intervenors from an order vacating a previous order permitting them to file in the above entitled divorce suit, their complaint in intervention alleging title or an interest in some of the property which is described and involved in the complaint for divorce.

After the appeal was submitted the intervenors' attorneys advised this court their clients had disposed of all their interest in the property and that they ‘have no further interest in this proceeding.’ In a written communication to this court, plaintiff's attorney concedes that the intervenors have disposed of their interest in the property. Since the appellants have disposed of their interest in the property and they are no longer interested in the appeal, no useful purpose will be subserved by determining the issues on appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network