Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
HARRY SCHEIBE, APPELLANT, v. MARTHA SCHEIBE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Plaintiff appealed from judgments entered in two actions brought by him against his wife. One was for divorce, and the other (the present one) for the partition of a sum of money on deposit in a joint tenancy account carried by them with San Jose Building–Loan Association, in which the latter was joined as a party defendant. Both appeals were presented on a record consisting of two clerk's transcripts, one reporter's transcript and one set of briefs. The judgment in the divorce action has this day, been affirmed (134 P.2d 835), and all questions involved in the present appeal are therein discussed and decided. For the reasons set forth therein, the judgment in the present case is likewise affirmed.
KNIGHT, Justice.
PETERS, P. J., and WARD, J., concurred.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 12189.
Decided: February 26, 1943
Court: District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)