PETER ROSTAIN PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT v. PHIL KATZ AS ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF OLGA GUGGENHEIM DECEASED ET AL DEFENDANTS ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CORPORATION DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT (1944)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

PETER R. ROSTAIN, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, v. PHIL C. KATZ, AS ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF OLGA GUGGENHEIM, DECEASED, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

Civ. 3112.

Decided: February 29, 1944

Earle P. Thompson, of Los Angeles, for appellant. H. E. Schmidt, of Bakersfield, for respondent.

This is an action to quiet title. The material facts are precisely similar to those in the case of Rostain v. Guggenheim, Cal.App., 146 P.2d 247, and the issues and questions raised are exactly the same. For the reasons stated in the decision in that case the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

BARNARD, Presiding Justice.

MARKS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network