IN RE: KAEMPER'S ESTATE. (1942)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California.

IN RE: KAEMPER'S ESTATE. KEMPER v. SMUKAL ET AL.

Civ. 13830.

Decided: December 03, 1942

William Ellis Lady, of Los Angeles, for appellant. Ernest C. Griffith, of Los Angeles, for respondents.

Respondents have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has failed to file her points and authorities within the time allowed by rule and an order of this court. The appellant has failed to oppose the motion.

It appears that the time allowed by Rule I of the Rules for Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal for the filing of appellant's points and authorities expired on August 21, 1942, that within that period appellant obtained from this court an order extending the time for filing her opening brief to September 21, 1942, but that no brief or memorandum of points and authorities in behalf of appellant has been filed within that time or at all.

Under the circumstances appellant is deemed to have abandoned the appeal, Rule V, sec. 3, and the same is hereby dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

SCHAUER, P. J., SHINN, J., and SHAW, J., pro tem. concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network