ROHDE v. ROHDE (1942)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

ROHDE v. ROHDE.

Civ. 13551.

Decided: June 06, 1942

Henry E. Phister, of Los Angeles, for appellant. Joseph Henry Wolf, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

The attorneys in the above entitled action having filed in this court their stipulation asking that the judgment in said cause be modified in part, and an examination of the record on appeal showing good cause therefor; the trial court is hereby directed to modify the interlocutory decree entered in said cause by striking therefrom all except the first three paragraphs of said decree, and to amend the last three words of said third paragraph to read “approved and affirmed,” instead of “disapproved and disaffirmed.”

As so modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, the remittitur to issue forthwith, each party to pay his own costs on appeal.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network