PASKAL ET AL v. NESTERENKO ET AL (1942)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

PASKAL ET AL. v. NESTERENKO ET AL.

Civ. 13904.

Decided: October 29, 1942

No appearance for appellants. C. F. Jorz, of Los Angeles, for respondents.

Respondents having served and filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled matter on the ground that appellants have failed to file a transcript as provided in the Rules of the Judicial Council for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, supported by a certificate of the Clerk of the Superior Court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this Court, and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by the said certificate and the authorities cited,

It is hereby ordered that the appeal from the judgment be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network