SPRINGER v. ANGELES CREDIT CO LIMITED ET AL (1941)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

SPRINGER v. ANGELES CREDIT CO., LIMITED, ET AL.

Civ. 12967.

Decided: May 07, 1941

Dailey S. Stafford and William H. Haupt, both of Los Angeles, for appellant. J. Everett Blum and John Moore Robinson, both of Los Angeles (Ralph W. Smith, of Los Angeles, of counsel), for respondents.

This is a motion to consolidate with this appeal the appeal of the respondents in the same case, 113 P.2d 7.

In view of the fact that we have this day dismissed appellant's appeal 113 P.2d 10 for failure to comply with the requirements of Rule I, section 4, and Rule V, section 1, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, the present motion is moot and is therefore denied.

McCOMB, Justice.

We concur: MOORE, P. J.; WOOD, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network