BLAYLOCK v. COATES ET AL (1941)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

BLAYLOCK v. COATES ET AL.

Civ. 13002.

Decided: May 16, 1941

Fred A. Shaeffer, of Santa Maria, and Wilbur D. Garber, of Temple City, for appellant. Marion A. Smith, of Santa Maria, and D. E. Ruppé and C. W. Bowers, both of Los Angeles, for respondent.

A judgment in the sum of $500 was rendered by the superior court in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Mabel Coates. Thereafter plaintiff filed her memorandum of costs and disbursements and the defendant, objecting to certain items, filed her motion to have the costs taxed by the court. The court made an order striking various items claimed by plaintiff as proper disbursements. From this order plaintiff has appealed.

On a separate appeal, which was prosecuted by defendant from the judgment in plaintiff's favor, we have this day entered an order reversing the judgment for $500. 113 P.2d 256. The issue has therefore become moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

WOOD, Acting Presiding Justice.

I concur: McCOMB, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network