Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE, RESPONDENT, v. WARREN MARR, APPELLANT.
The facts herein are in all material respects the same or similar to those involved in the opinion this day filed in People v. Marr, 113 P.2d 22.
In this case only one objection to the transcript was made and only one correction sought. It involves only the correction of one word, and is immaterial here for the reasons given in the opinion referred to.
The motion is denied.
BARNARD, Presiding Justice.
We concur: MARKS, J.; GRIFFIN, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 614.
Decided: May 12, 1941
Court: District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)