LAUDER v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY (1939)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

Jack LAUDER, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of State of California IN AND FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

Civ. 12393

Decided: August 11, 1939

Orloff & Katz, of Los Angeles (Abraham Gorenfeld, of Los Angeles, of counsel), for petitioner.

We have this day filed a memorandum in the case of Rex, Inc., v. Superior Court, Cal.App., 93 P.2d 182. For the reasons therein given, the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.

PER CURIAM.

YORK, P.J., being absent, did not participate herein.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network