ATKINSON v. WARREN (1939)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

Maurice E. ATKINSON, Petitioner, v. Earl WARREN, Atty. Gen. of the State of California, Respondent.

Civ. 12396

Decided: August 15, 1939

Smith, Peek & Aspey and Bartlett & Kearney, all of Los Angeles, for petitioner.

The petition is denied for the reason that the facts alleged therein are insufficient to justify the issuance of a writ of mandate in accordance with the prayer of the petition.

Mr. Justice WHITE was in favor of the issuance of said writ.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network