BUJULIAN v. CONSOLIDATED IRR DIST (1940)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

BUJULIAN v. CONSOLIDATED IRR. DIST.

Civ. 2535

Decided: February 14, 1940

Harris, Willey & Harris, of Fresno, for respondent.

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no transcript has been filed and that the time for preparing a record has expired.

It appears from the certificate of the county clerk that judgment was entered on June 5, 1939; that a motion for new trial was denied on August 4, 1939; that notice of appeal and notice to the clerk to prepare a transcript was filed on August 17, 1939; that on September 29, 1939, an order was made terminating proceedings for the preparation of a transcript; that that order has not been appealed from and that no proceedings are pending for the settlement of a bill of exception or for the preparation of a transcript on appeal.

The order terminating proceedings for the preparation of a transcript having become final, no transcript having been prepared or filed, and no appearance having been made by the appellant in response to notice of this motion, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. Olinger v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, 18 Cal.App.2d 104, 62 P.2d 1406; Wood v. Peterson Farms Company, 131 Cal.App. 312, 21 P.2d 468.

The appeal is dismissed.

BARNARD, Presiding Justice.

We concur: MARKS, J.; GRIFFIN, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network