PEOPLE v. THOMPSON (1939)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

PEOPLE v. THOMPSON et al.

Cr. 3183

Decided: May 17, 1939

Riley Thompson, in pro. per. for respondent. Earl Warren, Atty. Gen., and Alberta Belford, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the People.

After having given notice of appeal in the superior court from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, appellant presented to the trial judge his request for a transcript, but failed to set forth therein the grounds of his appeal. He filed no brief in this court, nor did he make any appearance herein.

For the foregoing reasons, and pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial are, and each of them is, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network