PEDIGO v. CRESSMAN (1939)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

PEDIGO v. CRESSMAN.

Civ. 2244

Decided: February 24, 1939

Rae B. Carter, of Fresno, for appellant. H.E. Barbour and W.B. Backlund, both of Fresno, for respondent.

This is an attempted appeal from an order of the superior court of Fresno county, sustaining the general demurrer of the respondent to appellant's amended complaint.

An appeal does not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint and an attempted appeal from such an order will be dismissed. Code Civ.Proc., sec. 963; Bryant v. Kelly, 203 Cal. 721, 265 P. 817; Harmon v. De Turk, 176 Cal. 758, 761, 169 P. 680.

The appeal is dismissed.

GRIFFIN, Justice.

We concur: BARNARD, P.J.; MARKS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network