AGRICULTURAL PRORATE COMMISSION v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY (1938)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

AGRICULTURAL PRORATE COMMISSION et al. v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY et al.

Civ. 2414

Decided: December 22, 1938

U.S. Webb, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Atty. Gen., for applicants.

This is a companion case to 85 P.2d 898, bearing the same title, the opinion in which case is this day filed. That opinion contains facts material to this proceeding. Those facts will not be repeated here.

On November 28, 1938, the respondent court, on the ex parte application of the plaintiffs in the superior court action, issued a second temporary restraining order and order to show cause returnable on December 5, 1938. Except as to dates it was identical with the order described in the other opinion.

On December 5, 1938, over the objection and without the consent of defendants in the superior court action, the respondent court continued the hearing of the order to show cause to December 19, 1938. The order continued the restraining order in force until that date. This was contrary to the express provisions of section 527 of the Code of Civil Procedure quoted in our other opinion.

The writ of prohibition will issue as prayed for.

MARKS, Justice.

We concur: BARNARD, P.J.; GRIFFIN, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network