LAUGHLIN v. STATE (1939)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

Ella T. LAUGHLIN (a Widow), Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE of California, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. 10830.

Decided: October 13, 1939

C.C. Carleton, Frank B. Durkee, C.R. Montgomery, and Robert E. Reed, all of Sacramento, for the State. Louis J. Trabucco and Eugene K. Sturgis, both of Oakland, for respondent.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the superior court of Alameda county in favor of plaintiff awarding damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff as the result of the construction of a subway fronting plaintiff's property. All material questions here presented are disposed of in a decision that day filed in the case of Rose et al. v. State of California et al., Cal.App., 94 P.2d 1058. Upon the authorities there cited and for the reasons there given, the judgment herein is reversed.

GEARY, Justice pro tem.

We concur: KNIGHT, Acting P.J.; WARD, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network