BOND v. RUSSELL (1938)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

BOND v. RUSSELL.

Civ. 11959

Decided: September 27, 1938

Kellogg & Matlin and David A. Matlin, all of Los Angeles, for appellant. Albert G. Bergman, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled case on the ground that appellant has failed to furnish this court with a proper record.

Appellant has failed to supply this court with any record whatsoever. It also appears that the superior court has made an order terminating all proceedings in that court. Therefore, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

McCOMB, Justice.

We concur: CRAIL, P.J.; WOOD, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network