MEYER HOLLER v. RAMONA VILLAGE (1935)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

MEYER & HOLLER v. RAMONA VILLAGE et al.

Civ. 8788.

Decided: April 27, 1935

Scott McReynolds, of Los Angeles, for appellants. Loeb, Walker & Loeb, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

On consideration of the petition presented to this court by the appellants for a rehearing of their appeal, it is ordered that the words “and severally” that occur in the fifth and sixth lines of the fifth paragraph, and the words “and several” that occur in the third line of the ninth paragraph, of the opinion of this court heretofore filed herein, and as the said words appear in the advance sheets of 43 P.(2d) 823 at pages 825 and 826, respectively, be and they are eliminated from said opinion.

It is further ordered that the said petition for rehearing herein be and it is denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network