McQUEEN v. FRODING (1938)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

McQUEEN v. FRODING.

Civ. 10709.

Decided: May 05, 1938

William F. Rose, of San Francisco, and Paul C. Thorne, of Mill Valley, for appellant. Knight, Boland & Riordan and J. W. Radil, all of San Francisco, for respondent.

Respondent having served and filed notice of motion to dismiss appeal herein, and no appearance having been made on behalf of appellant at the hearing of the motion, and no opposition having been filed thereto, it is ordered that the motion be, and the same is hereby, granted upon the grounds stated therein, and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network