MORRIS v. GIBSON RECLAMATION DIST NO 108 (1937)

District Court of Appeal, Third District, California.

MORRIS v. GIBSON (RECLAMATION DIST. NO. 108 et al., interveners).

Civ. 5742.

Decided: April 02, 1937

Clark, Nichols & Eltse, of Berkeley, for petitioner. Ralph W. Rutledge, of Colusa, for respondent. A. C. Huston, of Woodland, Thomas Rutledge, of Colusa, Horace B. Wulff, of Sacramento, and Athearn, Chandler & Farmer, Milton T. Farmer, and Edward G. Chandler, all of San Francisco, for interveners.

The opinion heretofore filed in this cause is hereby set aside and the petitions for rehearing are hereby granted, for the purpose of having an accounting taken after reference therefor, in order that it may be determined whether the bond fund of Reclamation District No. 108 is or is not insolvent, and also, as to what the financial condition of said district actually is. After an accounting is had, the cause will be placed upon the calendar for further hearing.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network