PETERSON v. CORPORATION OF AMERICA (1937)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

Louise M. PETERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CORPORATION OF AMERICA (a Corporation), Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (a Corporation), First Doe, Second Doe and Third Doe, Defendants and Respondents.

Civ. 10464.

Decided: June 25, 1937

James F. Peck and Elizabeth M. Maxwell, both of San Francisco, for appellant. McKee, Tasheira & Wahrhaftig, of Oakland, for respondents Corporation of America and Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n.

Plaintiff brought an action similar to that brought in the companion case of Louise M. Peterson v. Corporation of America, 69 P.(2d) 904, the opinion in which last mentioned case has been this day filed. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.

The facts in the two cases are substantially the same for the purpose of this discussion except as noted in the opinion in Burg Bros. v. Corporation of America (Cal.App.) 69 P.(2d) 908.

The contentions of appellant here are covered by the discussion in the opinion above mentioned and for the reasons stated in said opinion we conclude that no ground for reversal has been shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

SPENCE, Acting Presiding Justice.

We concur: STURTEVANT, J.; DOOLING, Justice pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network