JAMESON v. GAVETT (1937)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

JAMESON v. GAVETT et al.

Civ. 2022.

Decided: May 12, 1937

Lewis R. Kirby and George A. Malette, both of San Diego, for appellants. Edward J. Kelly and Ben B. Rubin, both of San Diego, for respondent.

The respondent moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the appellants had failed to file their printed points and authorities within thirty days after the filing of the transcript, as required by rule I, section 4, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The transcript was filed on February 26, 1937. The motion to dismiss the appeal was filed on April 20, 1937. On May 8, 1937, the appellants filed their printed brief. Under the circumstances here appearing, the appeal should not be dismissed. North v. Evans, 114 Cal.App. 714, 300 P. 893; Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal.App. 55, 297 P. 564; Tyner v. Axt, 111 Cal.App. 187, 295 P. 97; Fishman v. Silva, 108 Cal. App. 121, 291 P. 430; Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc., 106 Cal.App. 346, 289 P. 650.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

BARNARD, Presiding Justice.

We concur: MARKS, J.; JENNINGS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network