PACIFIC WESTERN OIL CO v. BERN OIL CO (1936)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

PACIFIC WESTERN OIL CO. v. BERN OIL CO., Limited, et al.

Civ. 1369.

Decided: December 11, 1936

Hy Schwartz, of Los Angeles, Claflin & Dorsey, of Bakersfield, and Abe Richman and Sidney J. Unickel, both of Los Angeles, for appellants. Borton, Petrini & Conron, of Bakersfield, for respondent.

This appeal is from an order granting a preliminary injunction. After a hearing on the merits, a permanent injunction was issued.

The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the questions involved have become moot since the preliminary order has become merged in the permanent order.

No appearance was made in opposition to the motion and, so far as here appears, the question as to whether or not the preliminary injunction should have been issued is now moot. Mailhes v. Investors Syndicate, 220 Cal. 735, 32 P.(2d) 610; Sheward v. Citizens' Water Company, 90 Cal. 635, 27 P. 439; People's Ditch Co. v. Foothill Irr. Dist., 103 Cal.App. 321, 284 P. 514.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

BARNARD, Presiding Justice.

We concur: MARKS, J.; JENNINGS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network