OLINGER v. PACIFIC GREYHOUND LINES (1936)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

OLINGER et al. v. PACIFIC GREYHOUND LINES.

Civ. 2002.

Decided: December 10, 1936

C. C. Pease, of San Diego, for appellants. Wright, Monroe, Thomas & Glenn, of San Diego, for respondent.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal under the provisions of rule V, Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The certificate of the county clerk of San Diego county shows that judgment was entered on February 15, 1936; that motion for new trial was denied on April 18, 1936, and notice given on April 22, 1936; that notice of appeal was filed May 29, 1936; that no proceedings are pending for preparation of a transcript nor settlement of a bill of exceptions.

No transcript has been filed here and no appearance made by appellant.

The appeal is dismissed.

MARKS, Justice.

We concur: BARNARD, P. J.; JENNINGS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network