CARSON v. EMMONS DRAYING SAFE MOVING COMPANY (1936)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

James A. CARSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EMMONS DRAYING & SAFE MOVING COMPANY (a Corporation), Nicholas Walsh et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Civ. 10039.

Decided: December 31, 1936

Redman, Alexander & Bacon and Herbert Chamberlin, all of San Francisco, for appellants. George K. Ford, of San Francisco, for respondent.

For the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed, entitled James A. Carson, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Emmons Draying & Safe Moving Co., etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants (Cal.App.) 64 P.(2d) 176, it is ordered that plaintiff's motion for diminution of record be and the same is hereby granted conditionally upon the payment to defendants of the cost of the printing of defendants' briefs on the appeal from the order granting a new trial, not exceeding in any event the statutory sum of $100.

KNIGHT, Justice.

We concur: TYLER, P. J.; CASHIN, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network