CARRASCO v. MARCUS (1936)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

CARRASCO v. MARCUS et al.

Civ. 1674.

Decided: December 10, 1936

Robert Richards, of Bishop, for appellants. Jess G. Sutliff, of Independence, and Glenn E. Tinder, of Bishop, for respondent.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Inyo county under the provisions of rule 5, Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The certificate of the county clerk of Inyo county shows that judgment was rendered and entered on October 4, 1935, and that notice of appeal to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, was filed on December 30, 1935. Because of jurisdiction the case was transferred to the Supreme Court, and by that court transferred here.

Neither transcript nor briefs have been filed, and no appearance has been made by appellants although the legal time within which to do so has long since expired.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

MARKS, Justice.

We concur: BARNARD, P. J.; JENNINGS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network