Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE v. LISENBA.
This is an appeal from a conviction of incest, a felony. The clerk's transcript was filed on June 19, 1936. The reporter's transcript was filed July 3, 1936, and the case was ordered on the calendar for August 14, 1936, and due notice given. At the request of defendant the case has been continued six times, the last continuance being to October 9, 1936. The continuance to that date was at the request of the defendant and with full notice and knowledge on his part. At the hearing on that date the defendant did not appear. Neither has a brief been filed on behalf of appellant. Under authority of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
CRAIL, Presiding Justice.
We concur: WOOD, J.; McCOMB, Justice pro tem.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 2894.
Decided: October 13, 1936
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)