KURLAND v. FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION (1936)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

Samuel L. KURLAND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION, Inc., Ella Summers, One Doe, Two Doe, Three Doe, Four Doe, Five Doe, One Doe Corporation, Two Doe Corporation, Three Doe Corporation, One Doe, a Copartnership, and Two Doe, a Copartnership, Defendants and Respondents.

Civ. 10909.

Decided: June 27, 1936

Don M. Kitzmiller, of Santa Monica, and F. D. R. Moote, of Los Angeles, for appellant. Call & Murphey, Robert B. Murphey, Alex W. Davis, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe, and Vincent Morgan, all of Los Angeles, for respondents.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff's complaint, which alleged that defendant had libeled plaintiff.

On a similar set of facts we have this day decided in the case of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., et al., 59 P.(2d) 203, the identical questions of law involved in the instant case.

Therefore on the authority of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

McCOMB, Justice pro tem.

We concur: CRAIL, P. J.; WOOD, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network