REPOSA v. PEARCE (1936)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

REPOSA v. PEARCE.

Civ. 9934.

Decided: January 30, 1936

J. E. McCurdy and F. E. Hoffmann, both of San Mateo, for appellant. Larrouy & Macdonald, of Redwood City, for respondent.

This is an appeal from an order amending a bill of exceptions in Reposa v. Pearce (Cal.App.) 54 P.(2d) 475. The amendment was made to include the original statements of indebtedness included in the plaintiff's claim for special damages. Because of the judgment in the main case holding that plaintiff was not entitled to any damages, the question raised here has become moot.

For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.

NOURSE, Presiding Justice.

We concur: STURTEVANT, J.; SPENCE, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network