PEOPLE v. POTTER (1935)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

PEOPLE of State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Howard L. POTTER, Defendant and Appellant.

Cr. 2628.

Decided: June 28, 1935

Charles S. McKelvey, of Los Angeles, for appellant. U. S. Webb, Atty. Gen., and Bayard Rhone, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the People.

Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground that the transcript contains no statement of the grounds of appeal or the points upon which appellant relies, as required by section 7, rule II, of the Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.

The point for decision herein is practically the same as in People v. Gonzales, 4 Cal. App. (2d) -, 47 P.(2d) 314, this day decided, and our ruling follows our expressions therein made.

The appeal is dismissed.

STEPHENS, Presiding Justice.

I concur: CRAIL, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network