IN RE: BURNETT'S ESTATE.* (1935)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

IN RE: BURNETT'S ESTATE.*

Civ. 1379.

Decided: July 10, 1935

Robert B. Gaylord, of San Francisco, and W. R. Bailey, of Visalia, for appellant. Russell & Heid, of Tulare, for respondents.

This is a motion to recall a remittitur and to order a corrected remittitur to be issued nunc pro tunc.

On April 11, 1935, this court filed its decision in the matter of the Estate of W. I. Burnett, deceased, and reversed a decree of distribution without making any provision for the payment of costs. Estate of Burnett (Cal. App.) 44 P.(2d) 435. On June 11, 1935, a remittitur was issued in which the following erroneously appeared: “Appellant to recover costs on appeal.” Section 1232, Probate Code.

In Re Estate of Erickson (Cal. App.) 41 P.(2d) 939, where a similar question was before the court, a similar motion was granted. See Estate of Johnson, 200 Cal. 307, 252 P. 1052.

It is ordered that the remittitur issued by the clerk of this court on June 11, 1935, in the matter of the Estate of W. I. Burnett, deceased, be recalled and that a corrected remittitur be issued in its place, nunc pro tunc, omitting the words, “Appellant to recover costs on appeal.”

MARKS, Justice.

We concur: BARNARD, P. J.; JENNINGS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network