ZAHNISER v. WHITE (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

ZAHNISER v. WHITE et al.

Civ. 1175.

Decided: December 13, 1934

A. P. Michael Narlian, of Los Angeles, and Edgar E. Hendee, of San Diego, for appellant. Maurice M. Myers, of Oceanside, for respondents.

This motion to dismiss the appeal herein is supported by the certificate of the county clerk, and the facts therein stated are not contradicted. It is thereby made to appear that the only step in furtherance of the appeal which has been taken by appellant was the filing of a notice of appeal on April 19, 1933. No bill of exceptions has been settled, as provided in section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and no transcript has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of said Code. The statutory period within which a record may be filed on appeal under either of the methods of appeal provided for by the Code of Civil Procedure has expired. It follows that the motion should be granted. People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139, 283 P. 981; rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

JENNINGS, Justice.

We concur: BARNARD, P. J.; MARKS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network