IN RE: the Application of Earl AMBROSE (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

IN RE: the Application of Earl AMBROSE, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Cr. 305.

Decided: December 14, 1934

Harry Pransky and James M. Carter, both of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Earl Redwine, Dist. Atty., of Riverside, for respondent.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. With the exception of the name of the petitioner, the essential facts herein are identical with those appearing in the case of In re Salas (Cal. App.) 38 P.(2d) 806, this day decided. For the reasons therein given, a similar order should be entered herein.

The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded.

BARNARD, Presiding Justice.

We concur: MARKS, J.; JENNINGS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network