IN RE: GROSSMAN. (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

IN RE: GROSSMAN. GROSSMAN v. ARDERY.

Civ. 8291.

Decided: December 08, 1934

Stanley F. Maurseth, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe, and Kenneth K. Wright, all of Los Angeles, for appellant. Chotiner, Recht & Chotiner, of Los Angeles, for respondent. Carroll H. Smith, of San Diego, amicus curiæ.

The appeal herein is from a judgment by which a newspaper printed in the Spanish language and known as El Heraldo de Mexico was adjudicated a newspaper “of general circulation,” within the meaning and intent of the provisions of sections 4458 to 4465, inclusive, of the Political Code.

With the general exception that a comparatively small part of the newspaper in question was printed in the English language, to all intents and purposes the situation of the newspaper in regard to a compliance with the requirements contained in the Constitution of this state and the statute to which reference hereinbefore has been had does not differ from that more particularly set forth in the opinion this day filed in the Matter of L'Italo-Americano (Cal. App.) 38 P.(2d) 810. Relying upon the decision in that case as authority applicable to the facts herein, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it is, reversed.

HOUSER, Justice.

We concur: CONREY, P. J.; YORK, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network