Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LEWIS et al. v. SHAW et al.
On May 9, 1933, Harriett Morrow appealed from an order denying her motion to dissolve an attachment. The clerk's transcript on appeal was filed here on July 1, 1933. As nothing further was filed, this court, on its own motion, on September 13, 1934, ordered appellant to show cause why her appeal should not be dismissed. There has been no response to the order and no briefs filed.
Under the authority of section 1 of rule 5, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, the appeal is dismissed.
MARKS, Justice.
We concur: BARNARD, P. J.; JENNINGS, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 1456.
Decided: October 16, 1934
Court: District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)