HALL ET AL v. BERLINER ET AL (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

HALL ET AL. v. BERLINER ET AL.

Civ. 1343.

Decided: May 09, 1934

Richard C. Waltz, of Beverly Hills, and Brittan & Mack, of Bakersfield, for appellants. Borton & Petrini, of Bakersfield, for respondents.

This is an appeal from a judgment following a directed verdict in an action for damages for wrongful death. All parties concerned are now convinced that the instruction for a directed verdict was erroneously given and, by stipulation, have consented and requested that the judgment be reversed and the action remanded for a new trial upon all of the issues.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment be reversed and the action remanded for a new trial upon all of the issues and that the remittitur issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network