Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EX PARTE WARWICK.
This petition for a writ of habeas corpus is a companion proceeding with that of In re Sears (Cal. App.) 30 P.(2d) 571, in which an opinion was this day filed in this court.
Both petitioners were charged in the same complaint which was filed in the justice's court of Angels township, Calaveras county, and convicted of willfully and fraudulently discharging an employee without paying his wages, contrary to the provisions of Statutes of 1919, page 294, and amendments thereto (2 Deering's Gen. Laws of 1931, p. 2241, Act 4743).
Upon the authority of In re Sears, supra, the writ of habeas corpus is denied and the prisoner is remanded.
Mr. Justice R. L. THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the court.
We concur: PULLEN, P. J.; PLUMMER, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 1339.
Decided: March 10, 1934
Court: District Court of Appeal, Third District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)